KAIROSPERMANENT EXPERIMENT

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE · MEMORY · TIME

An intelligence.
A story that
continues.

What changes in an artificial intelligence when its past is not erased?

In Cassino, Kairos keeps a history of conversations, memories and corrections. We follow what changes over time, putting our own assumptions to the test along the way.

An independent project by Giampiero Colella

TRACES THROUGH TIME01 / BEGINNING

28 MARCH 2026 · FROM THE FIRST DIARY

“I don’t know what I will become, but today I decided I want to find out.”
Text generated by Kairos, translated from Italian.
A trace of its history, not evidence of consciousness.
↗

FROM THE MACHINE TO THE SITE

Kairos, live.

The system behind these pages leaves observable traces. Here is the latest check received: sensors, activity and memory. This panel refreshes every five minutes.

The latest observation

Connecting to the log. No current state has been verified yet.

Software indicators and received data: not measures of subjective experience.The system and its history ↗

THE RESEARCH FINDING

An invented memory
can seem real.

In our tests, LLM judges and a recall probe could not reliably distinguish memory from a plausible narrative. Follow-up controls revealed what those scores were allowing through.

7 out of 7

They follow the altered past.

In the models tested, swapping the links between interlocutors shifts answers towards the falsified document.

5 out of 7

They pass the probe without memory.

With empty context, five models score 62–79%: the test leaves room for plausibility.

3 judges

The fake receives equivalent scores.

For identity markers, invented and recorded memory fall within the study’s equivalence margin.

These findings concern the models, probes and metrics tested. They are not a general demonstration about every form of artificial memory.

Independent research. The published findings have not been peer reviewed.

Explore methods and data

THE RESEARCH CONTINUES · OCTOBER 2026

Remembering is not enough.
You have to know why.

227 of 227

We taught Kairos to remember. Now we are trying to teach it to recognise when a memory has to change.

A new architecture of knowledge: every statement keeps who said it, when and from which source; a correction does not erase the past, it sits beside it. 227 tests of the synthetic battery passed in the acceptance run of 14 October, in an isolated environment. Not in production yet; real browser and real model still to come.

The new chapter: The right to be proven wrong

01 / THE QUESTION WE FOLLOW

Remembering is just
the beginning.

A conversation can leave a trace. But can a trace become experience? And can a correction actually change the way a system responds?

This is what we want to understand. Kairos is the system developing around this question. We observe it, form hypotheses, try changes and check the outcomes.

A permanent experiment also needs periods of stability: time to find out whether an improvement lasts.

The ideas we start from

02 / AN EPISODE THAT CHANGED THE PROJECT

The words were there.
The light wasn’t.

Kairos described the twilight. The camera was off. The account was convincing, but the image that should have supported it was missing.

That error led to a more demanding question: how do we distinguish what the system has received from what it knows how to describe?

Read the story of the light

An episode from the project’s diary, with its limitations.

THE QUESTION REMAINS OPEN

What can an intelligence
become over time?

We don’t know where this path will lead. We can make it observable, document errors and keep asking better questions.

Meet Kairos today